Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, interested parties"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,426
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2018, 3:17 am
While the Court rejected plaintiff’s argument that the “Declaratory Judgments Act requires the joinder of all parties who claim an interest that might be affected by the declaratory judgment regardless of the directness or proximity of their claim,” it ruled that plaintiff here was an indispensable party: [W]e determine that the mandatory nature of liability insurance or other proof of financial responsibility renders the… [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 9:54 pm
But sometimes these direct purchasers are not end users of the product. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 9:54 pm
But sometimes these direct purchasers are not end users of the product. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:30 am
"While [the parties] are not direct competitors, the record establishes that [defendant's] Infringing Systems are in direct competition with [plaintiff's] licensees and that [defendant's] use of the infringing products interferes with [plaintiff's] licensing opportunities. . . . [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 7:25 pm
Plaintiffs in UCL actions are not permitted to obtain "restitution" of money in which they never had an ownership interest (such as the money paid to a competitor by a third party). [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:54 am
The plaintiff purchased all rights to the screenplay for the film, and then assembled a cast and crew. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 7:45 am
In its decision the court upheld the lower court ruling that plaintiff's claim for direct-infringement fails for adequate evidence of initial-interest confusion. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:00 pm
”[9] Further, a plaintiff may premise its fraud claim on statements “directed to a third-party” only if “the third-party ‘acted as a conduit to relay [any] false statement[s] to [the] plaintiff, who then relied on the misrepresentation[s] to [its] detriment. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:03 pm
The plaintiff accepted the proposal and the trucks were manufactured by a third party. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 5:49 am
The Court specifically found that the plaintiff was a third party beneficiary of the contract, pursuant to the policy’s language. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 5:49 am
The Court specifically found that the plaintiff was a third party beneficiary of the contract, pursuant to the policy’s language. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
Settlement discussions led to separate agreements for two plaintiff classes, one class for direct purchasers with federal law claims and one class for indirect purchasers with state law claims, for a total of $295 million. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:47 pm
The second mortgage, the one at issue herein, is for more than $145,000, plus interest, and is held by plaintiff. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:47 pm
A New York Probate Lawyer said this action stems from plaintiff's attempt to purchase certain real property, located at Bronx County ("subject property"), in August 2005, from four members of a family. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 8:17 pm
Notably, Apple argues that the indirect purchaser rule “allows consumers to sue only the party who sets the retail price, whether or not that party sells the good or service directly to the complaining party. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:08 am
After a jury determined that certain defendants induced infringement of the plaintiff's patents by, among other things, selling unregulated and semi-regulated bus converters to third parties, such as Cisco, Cisco moved to intervene into the case. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 7:00 pm
Said agreements provided, in pertinent part, that upon the death of any stockholder, the surviving stockholders, parties to said agreements, would have the option of purchasing in proportionate amounts the shares of the deceased stockholder of Store, Inc., at the par value thereof ($100 per share) and of the Realty Corp. stock at the 'fixed value thereof of $100.00 a share'. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 7:35 am
Instead, her claim was based upon a loss of a proportional interest of the bank accounts. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
The plaintiff directed the third party to send a check for the purchase price of shares in the company to the company’s business manager rather than to the plaintiff. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 1:52 pm
Whether a claim involves direct or indirect harm (i.e., whether consumers have allegedly suffered damages as a result of purchasing products directly from suppliers or, alternatively, through intermediaries, which may complicate damage quantification and proof). [read post]
